FICO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -9.99%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -5.61%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,196.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.06%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $472.83 which suggests that it could fall by -1.37%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.225%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$110.2M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.51x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 24.00x versus 28.75x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ncino has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 3.86%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Ncino's return on equity of -2.71%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,196.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.06%. On the other hand Ncino has an analysts' consensus of $30.36 which suggests that it could grow by 12.85%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Ncino, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Ncino.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ncino has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ncino offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ncino pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are larger than Ncino quarterly revenues of $144.1M. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Ncino's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.51x while Ncino's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 24.00x versus 5.59x for Ncino. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paycom Software has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 26.28%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Paycom Software's return on equity of 25.86%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,196.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.06%. On the other hand Paycom Software has an analysts' consensus of $240.55 which suggests that it could fall by -2.38%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Paycom Software, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Paycom Software.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paycom Software has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.515%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paycom Software offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software pays out 16.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Paycom Software's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than Paycom Software quarterly revenues of $530.5M. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Paycom Software's net income of $139.4M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.51x while Paycom Software's PE ratio is 35.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 24.00x versus 7.25x for Paycom Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 32.61% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 3.04%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Workday's return on equity of 5.65%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,196.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.06%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $297.62 which suggests that it could grow by 21.16%. Given that Workday has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Workday is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.291, which suggesting that the stock is 29.051% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.596%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $498.7M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Fair Isaac's net income of $162.6M is higher than Workday's net income of $68M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 76.51x while Workday's PE ratio is 135.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 24.00x versus 7.60x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.